tellaprompt

Prompts to write a report

Last updated

Reports fail at structure, not sentences. The working sequence is: get interviewed into an outline (the AI asks, you answer), draft section by section from YOUR facts, compress the executive summary until it carries the whole document, then run a critique pass before anyone else sees it. Four prompts, in that order.

What stays yours: the facts, the judgment, the recommendation. What the AI does: structure, prose, compression, and adversarial reading.

The four templates

Interview me into an outline

Blank page, deadline, and everything you know is in your head in the wrong order.

I need to write a [REPORT TYPE, E.G. QUARTERLY STATUS / PROJECT POST-MORTEM / MARKET ASSESSMENT] for [AUDIENCE]. Decision or purpose it serves: [WHAT READERS DO WITH IT].

Interview me: ask questions one at a time (max 8 total) to extract what the report needs — findings, evidence, constraints, recommendation. Follow up when my answer is vague; skip questions my earlier answers already covered.
Then deliver: a full outline with section headings, one line per section on what it must contain, which of MY statements maps where, and where I still owe evidence — marked [GAP].
Draft a section from facts only

Outline stands. Now each section, drafted tight from your bullet points — with nothing invented in the gaps.

Draft the section "[SECTION HEADING]" of my [REPORT TYPE]. Audience: [WHO]. Length: max [N] words. Register: [E.G. SOBER, DIRECT, NO CONSULTING-SPEAK].

My facts and bullets for this section:
[PASTE BULLETS, NUMBERS, QUOTES]

Rules: use only my material — where a connective claim is needed that I didn't supply, write [CLAIM NEEDED: …] instead of inventing it; every number keeps its comparison base; no "it is important to note", no paragraph-long throat-clearing; end the section with its single takeaway sentence in bold.

Why this works: [CLAIM NEEDED] markers are the honesty mechanism — the draft can't smuggle in filler facts, and you see exactly which connective tissue is missing.

Context firstFact densityAnti-AI style

Executive summary that carries the report

The one page most readers will ever read — written last, read first.

Write the executive summary of my finished report (pasted below). Audience: [SENIOR READERS + THEIR DECISION]. Hard limit: [200] words.

Structure: 1) the answer/recommendation in the first two sentences — not the topic, the ANSWER; 2) the three findings that carry it, each with its key number; 3) what it costs / what it needs; 4) the decision requested, with deadline.
Rules: no sentence that merely announces content ("this report examines…"); nothing in the summary that isn't in the report; a reader who stops here must know what to decide and why.

Report:
[PASTE FULL DRAFT]

Why this works: Answer-first summaries respect how senior readers actually read; the nothing-not-in-the-report rule keeps the summary honest under questioning.

Output formatFact density

Pre-submission critique

Done, you think. Twenty minutes of adversarial reading now beats the reply-all question you didn't see coming.

Read my report as its most skeptical recipient: [WHO THAT IS, THEIR STAKE]. No praise.

Deliver: 1) the 3 questions they will ask that the report doesn't answer; 2) the weakest claim — quote it — and what evidence would fix it; 3) internal contradictions or numbers that don't reconcile (check the summary against the body!); 4) what the report avoids saying, and whether that avoidance is visible; 5) the strongest counter-position to my recommendation, argued in 3 sentences — so I can address it before they raise it.

Report:
[PASTE]

Why this works: Summary-vs-body reconciliation and the argued counter-position are where reports actually get attacked — finding both pre-send converts ambush into footnote.

Brutal criticRole definition

Frequently asked questions

Can the AI write the whole report in one go?

It can produce something report-shaped; it will be generic and quietly padded. The four-step split (outline ← interview, sections ← your facts, summary ← finished report, critique) keeps your substance in and the filler out — and is faster than repairing a one-shot draft.

How do I keep confidential figures safe?

Round or code-name sensitive numbers in consumer tools ([REVENUE_A]), or use an enterprise instance. The templates run identically — structure and prose don't care whether the number is real or a placeholder you re-insert.

What length should an executive summary be?

One page maximum, 150–250 words for most business reports — short enough to be read whole, complete enough to carry the decision. The discipline in the template (answer first, three findings, ask with deadline) matters more than the exact count.

Does this work for academic and technical reports?

Yes — swap the register placeholder and keep your field's structure (IMRaD, design docs). The interview-outline and critique prompts transfer directly; for citation-bearing text, pair with the researcher templates and never let the model supply references.